While some would call global
warming a theory, others would
call it a proven set of facts.
Opinions differ vehemently. Let us
consider global warming to be
both a premise that the
environment of the world as we
know it is slowly, but very surely
increasing in overall air and water
temperature, and a promise that
if whatever is causing this trend
is not interrupted or challenged
life on earth will dynamically be
affected.
The prevailing counter opinion is
that all that is presently perceived
to be global warming is simply
the result of a normal climactic
swing in the direction of
increased
temperature. Many proponents of
this global warming ideology have
definitive social and financial
interests in these claims.
Global warming and climate
change are aspects of our
environment that cannot be easily
or quickly discounted. Many
factions still strongly feel that the
changes our Earth is seeing
are the result of a natural climatic
adjustment. Regardless of one’s
perspective the effects of global
warming are a quantifiable set of
environmental results that are in
addition to any normal changes in
climate. That is why the effects of
global warming have catastrophic
potential. Global warming may
well be the straw that breaks the
camel’s back. It could turn out to
be the difference between a
category three hurricane and a
category four. Global warming as
caused by greenhouse gas
emissions can lead us to a
definite imbalance of nature.
The premise of global warming as
an issue of debate is that
industrial growth coupled with
non-structured methods we as
humans use to sustain ourselves
has created a situation where our
planet is getting progressively
hotter. We have seemingly
negatively effected our
environment by a cycle of harmful
processes that now seem to be
feeding upon themselves to
exponentially increase the
damage to our ecosystem.
No comments:
Post a Comment